Photos from the Inauguration

Here's the promised photo essay, showcasing the finest in left-wing

"protesting" our country has to offer. Without further ado...



Well, to start off, here are a few pictures showing moonbats in need of

a civics lesson.











Yes, per the procedures outlined in the United States Constitution,

George W. Bush is the legally elected President of the United States,

and no, he isn't getting crowned, since he was elected, as opposed to

being given supreme executive power by a farcial aquatic tart.



Next, we’ll have some of the standard anti-Republican tripe.







Haha, I’m so clever, I drew a Hitler moustache on Bush!







Or even better, I’ll just put the word “Republican” and a swastika on

the same sign. Yeah, those Nazis murdered millions of Jews and other

non-Aryans, and started a war that killed hundreds of millions, while

Republican administrations have liberated millions, from the USSR to

Iraq. Good analogy.



Speaking of analogies, here’s another good one, from South Korea:







Well, correct me if I’m wrong, but by most accounts, this guy named

Osama bin Laden has been responsible for the death of quite a few more

innocents than President Bush. Oh, and then there’s that crazy guy with

the bad haircut and nukes that lives a couple hundred miles north of

where you are. And I think there are some U.S. troops there, under the

command of the “#1 terrorist” protecting you from…him…nevermind.



Moving on, I thought that Dick Cheney was supposed to be Satan, not

Bush







Then there’s some moonbats in need of a history lesson, as well:







I’m sorry, but I’m kind of at a loss for how the “Worst President Ever”

could have liberated millions of people in two separate countries from

tyrannical regimes, supported numerous countries around the globe in

their fight against Islamic extremist terrorism, and kept our Country

safe.



On a tangent, here’s an interesting picture.







Hmm…I wonder why the police are shooting pepper spray at these

peaceful, non-violent protesters? It wouldn’t have anything to do with the fact

that they were throwing snowballs, plants, pots, cans of soda, and other

assorted hard objects at the before-mentioned officers, would it?



Finally, here’s a series of pictures illustrating the radical-Left’s

“support of the troops.” A mother, protesting in honor of her son, who

was KIA in Iraq:







A "Bring the Troops Home" sign:







Flag draped coffins:







And a collage of Bush made up of pictures of fallen soldiers:







Other than the fact that I doubt most of the soldiers in the collage

would have consented to the use of their likeness, or the fact that the

flag-draped coffins are a “body-count,” depersonalizing the soldiers who

fought and died for this country, these actions seem to be expressing

some fairly mainstream, accepted, sentiments. After all, I’m sure most

American citizens would empathize with the mother, whose son made the

ultimate sacrifice, and that most Americans do wish that all the troops

could come home and be with their families.



But then you have protesters who do this:







and this:







and this:







While these actions do not surprise me, it is ironic that people who

profess to supporting the troops burn and desecrate the flag that those

same troops salute every day. The same flag those troops serve under.

The same flag that was the last thing covering the coffins of their

fallen comrades.



In a similar vein, we have students at Seattle Central Community

College "supporting the troops," albeit in an absolutely despicable manner:







First, here’s the caption that went with that picture: “Sgt. 1st Class

Jeff Due, right, a U.S. Army recruiter, is surrounded by protesters at

Seattle Central Community College, Thursday, Jan. 20, 2005, in Seattle.

After about a 10-minute standoff during which protesters tore up U.S

Army literature, the protesters were successful in getting Due and

another recruiter to leave their table under escort by campus security

officers. Several hundred students walked out of classes at several

Seattle colleges and universities to protest the inauguration of

President Bush.”



This Army recruiter was simply doing his job, which is to go to college

campuses, and find those that are willing to serve this country. He

does this job regardless of who is in the White House, regardless of any

political affiliation he has, regardless of the foreign policy of this

country. John Kerry could have been inaugurated yesterday and pulled

every U.S. soldier out of Iraq, and Sgt. Due would still have gone to

Seattle Central Community College to try and recruit a few good men to

serve in the finest Army on Earth.



But the hundreds of “protesters” were too stupid to realize that. No,

they saw two men wearing U.S. Army uniforms who were heavily

outnumbered and vulnerable, and decided that to show their

displeasure with a politician, they would strike against these two men.

Never mind the fact that these men are among the same ones who gave

them the right to speak out against the above mentioned politician.

Never mind the fact that this soldier has nothing to do with the policy that

led to the War in Iraq these “protesters” were “protesting.” The “protesters”

reverted tothe timeless far-left technique of taking out your political

frustrations on men in uniform. Oh, and forget about non-violence and

civilized discourse. Why do that when you can jeer and intimidate,

forcing a soldier of the U.S. military to be escorted away by police,

for his own safety?



Hopefully, there will one day be a time when the shameful treatment

soldiers received during the 1960s and 1970s will truly be in the past.

Obviously, regardless of all the left’s rhetoric about supporting the

troops, that day still has not arrived.



There was one picture that made me laugh, though:







Now, look closely at the two females in the foreground of this picture.

Look familiar? If you need a hint, check out the flag-burners shown

above.