
Er, wrong Mighty Mouse. THIS is what I had in mind:

That's the Lockheed F-94 Starfire, one of this week's features. The Starfire and its counterpart, the Northrop F-89 Scorpion were the USAF's front-line interceptors for much of the 1950s.
Both aircraft got their start in similarly worded USAF requests for a jet powered night fighter/interceptor. The F-89 was designed to meet

Enter Lockheed. They took the TF-80 (T-33) trainer version of the first operational jet fighter, the P-80, stuck a radar from the B-36 in the nose, added a new afterburning jet engine, lengthened the fuse

Meanwhile, the F-89 entered initial service with the USAF in 1950 with the -A model. Dropping the 20mm turret, it was fitted with permanent wingtip fuel tanks and armed with

By this time it should be apparent just how prescient the USAF was in ordering the additional Starfire; the original Scorpion interceptor would not come fully online until the -D model in 1954. By that time the Starfire had been in service for four years. In fact, the last production version of the Starfire, the -C model, had been delivered before the Scorpion was totally online.
The -C model was a rather large redesign of the original F-94; originally it was to be designated the F-97, but it was decided to keep the F-94 designation, quite possibly for political reasons (it being easier to purchase a new aircraft when it is simply an "upgrade" of an existing airframe; see the Navy and compare the Hornet vs. the Super Hornet: completely different aircraft, but they share the same base F/A-18 designation. But I digress). The -C model featured a thinner, more efficient wing, a com

The F-94C went on to exemplary service, only having one major issue, which was the fact that the FFAR rockets, while effective, created so much smoke during firing that they blinded the crew. The solution was to move the rockets to midwing pods, where the smoke did not create as much of an issue. The F-94 was finally retired in 1959 as more capable interceptors started entering service.
As mentioned above, the first major production model of the F-89 was the -D model, but that didn't enter service until 1954. When it finally did enter service, it, like the Starfire, got rid of the cannon armament and used FFAR rockets mounted in pods of 52 on the wingtips. It also used the same AN/APG-40 radar and E-6 fire control system as the F-94. Over 600 were built.
The next production variant of the F-89 is the -H, which entered service in 1956. It featured an E-9 fire control system (like the early F-102) and massive new wingtip pods which held three Falcon missiles and 21 FFARs, which meant a total of (usually) 3 GAR-1 semi-active radar guided missiles, 3 GAR-2 infrared guided missiles, and 42 FFARs. Perhaps unsurprisingly, problems with the E-9 fire control system delayed its introduction into USAF service, by which time it was already being surpassed by more advanced interceptors like the F-102, so it was rather quickly and unceremoniously withdrawn.
The final production variant of the F-89 is the -J, which is the one I find most interesting. Why?

All this talk of FFARs has made me remember just how unguided those things were. As SJS points out, "The folding-fin rockets jinked around like crazy until the fins deployed, and the usual comment was "it was a wonder anybody could hit anything with them." Attacks on target drones apparently bore this out." I've also read a story of a B-45 Tornado that was towing a target and ended up having a Scorpion accidentally lock on it; the rockets were fired, but not a single one hit the Tornado. Granted, they weren't fully loaded since it was a practice run, but still.

Overall, the F-94 and F-89 both provided a blanket of protection (in conjuntion with such SAMs as Nike-Ajax and Nike-Hercules) over the U.S. in the 1950s; today, the sacrifices made by these personnel are largely forgotten, especially when compared to Korea, which just preceeded most of these aircraft's time, and Vietnam, which just exceeded them. It's an interesting window into the past, when we honestly thought that nuclear war was survivable, even winnable, just so long as we could prevent enough of his bombers from getting through.

Be sure to tune in next week when we look at yet another interceptor (I promise, this is the last one for awhile) from the post WWII but still piston engined era. The P/F-82 Twin Mustang. Also, make sure to check out Flightdeck Friday (parts 1 AND 2) over at SJS. He's doing one of my favorite Navy aircraft, the F4D, or more affectionately, the Ford.
No comments:
Post a Comment